D. KISHORE KUMAR vs The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur - 602001. Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 2/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, r/w 440. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 27th April 2026.
CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition
CNR: TNTR010004652026
e-Filing Number
19-01-2026
Filing Number
326/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
3-I Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
Police Station
Thiruvallur Town Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D. KISHORE KUMAR
Adv. Adam S.K
Respondent(s)
The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur - 602001. Advocate - Public Prosecutor
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Opposite to Combined Court Campus
Adv. Public Prosecutor
The Inspector of Police, B1, Thiruvallur Town Police Station, Thiruvallur.
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 3-I Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
Arguments
Await Records
Await Records
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Orders |
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Await Records |
| 30-03-2026 | Await Records |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the trial court's dismissal order. Finding prima facie evidence of criminal trespass, the court directed police to register an FIR after individuals allegedly surveyed the petitioner's land without authorization on two occasions (May 9 and 12, 2025), despite the petitioner having valid title confirmed by revenue authorities. The court held that FIR registration is mandatory when a complaint discloses a cognizable offense, and police should not be prevented from investigating at the initial stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the trial court's dismissal order. Finding prima facie evidence of criminal trespass, the court directed police to register an FIR after individuals allegedly surveyed the petitioner's land without authorization on two occasions (May 9 and 12, 2025), despite the petitioner having valid title confirmed by revenue authorities. The court held that FIR registration is mandatory when a complaint discloses a cognizable offense, and police should not be prevented from investigating at the initial stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts