M.Sarathkumar vs Lakshmi@Jessye Advocate - R.Dinesh Kumar — 18/2023
Case under Indiandivorceact Section 10(1)(x). Status: Counter. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNTR010003962023
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
123/2023
Filing Date
12-01-2023
Registration No
18/2023
Registration Date
12-01-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Sarathkumar
Adv. J.Dhanasekar
Respondent(s)
Lakshmi@Jessye Advocate - R.Dinesh Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Counter
Counter
Counter
Counter
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Counter |
| 12-03-2026 | Counter |
| 25-02-2026 | Counter |
| 04-02-2026 | Counter |
| 07-01-2026 | Counter |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: I.A.2/2023 in IDOP.18/2023 Outcome: Petition partly allowed Lakshmi sought interim maintenance from her husband M. Sarathkumar under Section 36 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, claiming Rs.10,000/month for herself, Rs.5,000/month each for two children, plus travel and litigation expenses. The Principal District Judge awarded Rs.7,500/month to the petitioner and Rs.7,500/month for both children (total Rs.15,000/month) to be paid by the 10th of each month, plus Rs.10,000 for litigation expenses. Travel expenses were denied due to lack of documentation. The maintenance continues until disposal of the main divorce petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: I.A.2/2023 in IDOP.18/2023 Outcome: Petition partly allowed Lakshmi sought interim maintenance from her husband M. Sarathkumar under Section 36 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, claiming Rs.10,000/month for herself, Rs.5,000/month each for two children, plus travel and litigation expenses. The Principal District Judge awarded Rs.7,500/month to the petitioner and Rs.7,500/month for both children (total Rs.15,000/month) to be paid by the 10th of each month, plus Rs.10,000 for litigation expenses. Travel expenses were denied due to lack of documentation. The maintenance continues until disposal of the main divorce petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts