Minor geetha and another vs Kasi and 8 others — 194/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26Order7R1cpc. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 12-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM240000152024

Filing Number

8/2024

Filing Date

05-Aug-2013

Registration No

194/2024

Registration Date

05-Aug-2013

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kilpennathur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26Order7R1cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Minor geetha and another

    Adv. C.Muthu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kasi and 8 others

Case History

  1. 12-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  3. 03-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  11. 11-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  14. 30-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  15. 28-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  16. 28-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary OS 194/2024 (Old OS 204/2013) - Cross-Examination (Witness DW2) The court conducted cross-examination of defendant witness Renuka regarding disputed land property matters. The court rejected several claims made by the witness regarding land divisions, mortgages, and property transfers involving survey number 55/2, finding inconsistencies in her testimony regarding land measurements, dates of transfer deeds, and the actual allocation of 21.5 cents to the plaintiff. The cross-examination revealed discrepancies in the witness's account of mortgage transactions and documented land divisions, which the court found unconvincing based on available evidence and documentary records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 28-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  18. 16-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  19. 16-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  20. 02-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  21. 14-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  22. 10-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  23. 06-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  24. 15-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  25. 13-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  26. 19-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Kilpennathur

  27. 04-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 05-Aug-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 194/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary OS 194/2024 (Old OS 204/2013) - Cross-Examination (Witness DW2) The court conducted cross-examination of defendant witness Renuka regarding disputed land property matters. The court rejected several claims made by the witness regarding land divisions, mortgages, and property transfers involving survey number 55/2, finding inconsistencies in her testimony regarding land measurements, dates of transfer deeds, and the actual allocation of 21.5 cents to the plaintiff. The cross-examination revealed discrepancies in the witness's account of mortgage transactions and documented land divisions, which the court found unconvincing based on available evidence and documentary records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case