Rajeshwari vs Arumugam — 463/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 33. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM230009592024
Filing Number
557/2024
Filing Date
11-07-2024
Registration No
463/2024
Registration Date
01-08-2024
Court
Sub Court, Vandavasi
Judge
3-Sub Judge,Vandavasi
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajeshwari
Adv. N.N.Nagarajan
Respondent(s)
Arumugam
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Sub Judge,Vandavasi
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 463/2024 – Rajeshwari v. Arumugam (Judgment Summary) The Subordinate Judge at Vandavasi decreed the plaintiff's mortgage recovery suit, holding the defendant liable to repay Rs.2,00,000/- principal with interest. The court rejected the defendant's claim that only Rs.1,50,000/- was advanced, finding the registered mortgage deed presumptively valid and the defendant's defense unsupported. The court also rejected the defendant's claim of full repayment in February 2022, noting the "discharge" consent deed was executed two years later with inconsistencies. However, the court deducted Rs.60,000/- in interest payments the defendant had made and awarded the plaintiff Rs.5,63,467/- total with 9% annual interest from suit filing until decree date, and 6% thereafter, along with suit costs and property sale provisions upon default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 463/2024 – Rajeshwari v. Arumugam (Judgment Summary) The Subordinate Judge at Vandavasi decreed the plaintiff's mortgage recovery suit, holding the defendant liable to repay Rs.2,00,000/- principal with interest. The court rejected the defendant's claim that only Rs.1,50,000/- was advanced, finding the registered mortgage deed presumptively valid and the defendant's defense unsupported. The court also rejected the defendant's claim of full repayment in February 2022, noting the "discharge" consent deed was executed two years later with inconsistencies. However, the court deducted Rs.60,000/- in interest payments the defendant had made and awarded the plaintiff Rs.5,63,467/- total with 9% annual interest from suit filing until decree date, and 6% thereafter, along with suit costs and property sale provisions upon default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts