Rajeshwari vs Arumugam — 463/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 33. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 26th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM230009592024

Case disposed

Filing Number

557/2024

Filing Date

11-07-2024

Registration No

463/2024

Registration Date

01-08-2024

Court

Sub Court, Vandavasi

Judge

3-Sub Judge,Vandavasi

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed with cost

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 33

Petitioner(s)

Rajeshwari

Adv. N.N.Nagarajan

Respondent(s)

Arumugam

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Sub Judge,Vandavasi

26-03-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Judgement

13-03-2026

Judgement

26-02-2026

Judgement

25-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case 463/2024 – Rajeshwari v. Arumugam (Judgment Summary) The Subordinate Judge at Vandavasi decreed the plaintiff's mortgage recovery suit, holding the defendant liable to repay Rs.2,00,000/- principal with interest. The court rejected the defendant's claim that only Rs.1,50,000/- was advanced, finding the registered mortgage deed presumptively valid and the defendant's defense unsupported. The court also rejected the defendant's claim of full repayment in February 2022, noting the "discharge" consent deed was executed two years later with inconsistencies. However, the court deducted Rs.60,000/- in interest payments the defendant had made and awarded the plaintiff Rs.5,63,467/- total with 9% annual interest from suit filing until decree date, and 6% thereafter, along with suit costs and property sale provisions upon default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case 463/2024 – Rajeshwari v. Arumugam (Judgment Summary) The Subordinate Judge at Vandavasi decreed the plaintiff's mortgage recovery suit, holding the defendant liable to repay Rs.2,00,000/- principal with interest. The court rejected the defendant's claim that only Rs.1,50,000/- was advanced, finding the registered mortgage deed presumptively valid and the defendant's defense unsupported. The court also rejected the defendant's claim of full repayment in February 2022, noting the "discharge" consent deed was executed two years later with inconsistencies. However, the court deducted Rs.60,000/- in interest payments the defendant had made and awarded the plaintiff Rs.5,63,467/- total with 9% annual interest from suit filing until decree date, and 6% thereafter, along with suit costs and property sale provisions upon default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Vandavasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case