BANK OF INDIA, KALASAPAKKAM BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER vs V.PRABADEVAN AND 2 OTHERS — 492/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section sec26,o7,r1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM220016172022

Filing Number

866/2022

Filing Date

05-Dec-2019

Registration No

492/2022

Registration Date

15-Nov-2022

Court

Sub Court, Polur

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Polur

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section sec26,o7,r1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANK OF INDIA, KALASAPAKKAM BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER

    Adv. THIRU.G.ARISTATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V.PRABADEVAN AND 2 OTHERS

  2. 2.VADIVEL

  3. 3.KUMARESAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

    The court decreed Bank of India's money recovery suit against the three defendants (V. Prabadevan, R. Vadivel, and J. Kumaresan), directing them to pay Rs. 4,14,115/- within one month plus 13.75% per annum interest until the decree date and 6% thereafter, plus court costs of Rs. 16,018/-. The suit was decided ex parte as defendants did not appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  12. 18-Sep-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  14. 08-Jul-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  15. 17-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  16. 26-Mar-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  17. 14-Mar-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  18. 14-Feb-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  19. 12-Dec-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  20. 23-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  21. 11-Sep-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  22. 07-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  23. 31-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  24. 26-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  25. 22-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  26. 21-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  27. 26-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  28. 03-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  29. 27-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  30. 04-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  31. 12-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  32. 01-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  33. 24-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  34. 22-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  35. 13-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 05-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 492/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The court decreed Bank of India's money recovery suit against the three defendants (V. Prabadevan, R. Vadivel, and J. Kumaresan), directing them to pay Rs. 4,14,115/- within one month plus 13.75% per annum interest until the decree date and 6% thereafter, plus court costs of Rs. 16,018/-. The suit was decided ex parte as defendants did not appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case