B.Balachander vs K.G.Megaladevi — 37/2023
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNTM220005512023
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
389/2023
Filing Date
10-04-2023
Registration No
37/2023
Registration Date
10-04-2023
Court
Sub Court, Polur
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge, Polur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
B.Balachander
Adv. P.Munusamy.M.A.,B.L.,(Polur)
Respondent(s)
K.G.Megaladevi
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Polur
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 17-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 29-01-2026 | IA Pending |
| 11-12-2025 | IA Pending |
| 20-11-2025 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a domestic violence case (HMO No. 37/2023) dated February 17, 2026, from Palaur Court in Tamil Nadu. The document contains the cross-examination testimony of the male respondent in a matrimonial dispute case under the Domestic Violence Act, where the petitioner (his wife) has filed allegations against him. The witness testified regarding various aspects of their marital relationship, including separation, finances, custody of their daughter, and disputes over jewelry and maintenance claims. The order records the completion of his cross-examination with the judge's signature, but does not contain a final judgment or order granting/dismissing the petition—it only documents the evidence-recording stage of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a domestic violence case (HMO No. 37/2023) dated February 17, 2026, from Palaur Court in Tamil Nadu. The document contains the cross-examination testimony of the male respondent in a matrimonial dispute case under the Domestic Violence Act, where the petitioner (his wife) has filed allegations against him. The witness testified regarding various aspects of their marital relationship, including separation, finances, custody of their daughter, and disputes over jewelry and maintenance claims. The order records the completion of his cross-examination with the judge's signature, but does not contain a final judgment or order granting/dismissing the petition—it only documents the evidence-recording stage of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts