DEEPA vs SURESH — 90/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia)(ib). Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 05th March 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNTM220005252025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-08-2025

Filing Number

575/2025

Filing Date

11-08-2025

Registration No

90/2025

Registration Date

11-08-2025

Court

Sub Court, Polur

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Polur

Decision Date

05th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia)(ib)

Petitioner(s)

DEEPA

Adv. P Arun Kumar

Respondent(s)

SURESH

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Polur

05-03-2026

Disposed

18-02-2026

Orders

05-02-2026

Arguments

19-12-2025

Ex-Parte Evidence

01-12-2025

Ex-Parte Evidence

Interim Orders

05-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

This document records the depositions of two witnesses (P.W.1 and P.W.2) in Case No. 90/2025 before the Subordinate Court, Paloor on February 5, 2026, in what appears to be a matrimonial dispute. Witness P.W.1 (Deepa, age 38) testified and submitted nine documentary exhibits including marriage certificate, family records, Aadhaar copies, and birth certificates of two children (Nithish Kumar and Manushka), while Witness P.W.2 (Thevaraj, age 64, retired) testified but provided no documentary evidence; both witnesses were not cross-examined as the respondent was declared absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the depositions of two witnesses (P.W.1 and P.W.2) in Case No. 90/2025 before the Subordinate Court, Paloor on February 5, 2026, in what appears to be a matrimonial dispute. Witness P.W.1 (Deepa, age 38) testified and submitted nine documentary exhibits including marriage certificate, family records, Aadhaar copies, and birth certificates of two children (Nithish Kumar and Manushka), while Witness P.W.2 (Thevaraj, age 64, retired) testified but provided no documentary evidence; both witnesses were not cross-examined as the respondent was declared absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Polur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case