SURESH vs SELVI — 42/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(i)(i-a)(i-b). Status: Ex-Parte Evidence. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNTM220002622025
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
e-Filing Number
22-04-2025
Filing Number
291/2025
Filing Date
23-04-2025
Registration No
42/2025
Registration Date
23-04-2025
Court
Sub Court, Polur
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge, Polur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURESH
Adv. Kumaran G
Respondent(s)
SELVI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Polur
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 07-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 27-11-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 22-10-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 04-09-2025 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness deposition record (H.M.O.P. No. 42/2025) from the Subordinate Court, Palur, dated March 5, 2026. Witness P.W.1 (Subhash, age 35) testified under oath regarding a matrimonial matter, presenting documentary evidence including marriage certificate, birth certificates of two children (born 2013 and 2016), Aadhar cards, and legal notice records. Cross-examination was not conducted as the opposing party was declared absent, and the witness's testimony was recorded and signed before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness deposition record (H.M.O.P. No. 42/2025) from the Subordinate Court, Palur, dated March 5, 2026. Witness P.W.1 (Subhash, age 35) testified under oath regarding a matrimonial matter, presenting documentary evidence including marriage certificate, birth certificates of two children (born 2013 and 2016), Aadhar cards, and legal notice records. Cross-examination was not conducted as the opposing party was declared absent, and the witness's testimony was recorded and signed before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts