SURESH vs SELVI — 42/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(i)(i-a)(i-b). Status: Ex-Parte Evidence. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNTM220002622025
e-Filing Number
22-04-2025
Filing Number
291/2025
Filing Date
23-Apr-2025
Registration No
42/2025
Registration Date
23-Apr-2025
Court
Sub Court, Polur
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge, Polur
Last updated 11-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESH
Adv. Kumaran G
Respondent(s)
-
1.SELVI
Case History
-
16-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary This is a witness deposition record (H.M.O.P. No. 42/2025) from the Subordinate Court, Palur, dated March 5, 2026. Witness P.W.1 (Subhash, age 35) testified under oath regarding a matrimonial matter, presenting documentary evidence including marriage certificate, birth certificates of two children (born 2013 and 2016), Aadhar cards, and legal notice records. Cross-examination was not conducted as the opposing party was declared absent, and the witness's testimony was recorded and signed before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Polur
-
07-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Polur
-
27-Nov-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Polur
-
22-Oct-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Polur
-
04-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Polur
-
22-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Polur
-
12-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 42/2025
Summary This is a witness deposition record (H.M.O.P. No. 42/2025) from the Subordinate Court, Palur, dated March 5, 2026. Witness P.W.1 (Subhash, age 35) testified under oath regarding a matrimonial matter, presenting documentary evidence including marriage certificate, birth certificates of two children (born 2013 and 2016), Aadhar cards, and legal notice records. Cross-examination was not conducted as the opposing party was declared absent, and the witness's testimony was recorded and signed before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts