Anitha and 1 another vs The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Advocate - K.A.( — 216/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24(B). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 06-Jun-2026

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTM220002412024

Filing Number

140/2024

Filing Date

01-Jun-2017

Registration No

216/2024

Registration Date

21-Feb-2024

Court

Sub Court, Polur

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Polur

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anitha and 1 another

    Adv. P.Arunkumar. B.A.B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Advocate - K.A.(

  2. 2.,J.V.G(

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  11. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  12. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  13. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  14. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  15. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  16. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  17. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  18. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  19. 30-Jun-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This document records witness examination in Case 216/2024 dated June 30, 2025. The witness (Renuka) testified regarding an accident involving the petitioner (Anitha's relative). During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was questioned—she admitted providing inconsistent statements about the vehicle involved in the accident, initially claiming ignorance but later mentioning a specific vehicle number (TN23AA9567). The court found the witness's testimony unreliable due to contradictions and noted she lacked direct knowledge of the accident. The cross-examination was completed with no re-examination ordered, and the witness's testimony was deemed inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 30-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  21. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  22. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  23. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  24. 12-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  25. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  26. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  27. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  28. 23-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  29. 10-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  30. 31-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  31. 10-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  32. 21-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 01-Jun-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 216/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This document records witness examination in Case 216/2024 dated June 30, 2025. The witness (Renuka) testified regarding an accident involving the petitioner (Anitha's relative). During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was questioned—she admitted providing inconsistent statements about the vehicle involved in the accident, initially claiming ignorance but later mentioning a specific vehicle number (TN23AA9567). The court found the witness's testimony unreliable due to contradictions and noted she lacked direct knowledge of the accident. The cross-examination was completed with no re-examination ordered, and the witness's testimony was deemed inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case