Munusamy vs Azhagesan Advocate - R. Mani — 100109/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(d)25(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM160007852018
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100109/2018
Filing Date
03-11-2018
Registration No
100109/2018
Registration Date
31-10-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Vandavasi
Judge
2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Munusamy
Adv. Tr.V.G.Senthilkumar
Respondent(s)
Azhagesan Advocate - R. Mani
Shanmugam
Velu
Saraswathi
Viswanathan
Vijaya
Dharani
District collector
Thasildar
SubRegistrar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a District Munsif court order from Vandavasi (Case No. 109/2018, dated 13.02.2026) in Tamil regarding a property/succession dispute. The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence spanning multiple decades (documents from 1980-2014). The court found several documents (deeds dated 24.12.1991, 04.12.2006, and 07.11.2014) to be null and void due to procedural defects and lack of proper authority. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims regarding property ownership and succession rights, finding insufficient evidence and procedural violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a District Munsif court order from Vandavasi (Case No. 109/2018, dated 13.02.2026) in Tamil regarding a property/succession dispute. The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence spanning multiple decades (documents from 1980-2014). The court found several documents (deeds dated 24.12.1991, 04.12.2006, and 07.11.2014) to be null and void due to procedural defects and lack of proper authority. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims regarding property ownership and succession rights, finding insufficient evidence and procedural violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts