Mallika vs Barook Advocate - Tr.T.G.Ezhilarasan — 200107/2012

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM160003672012

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

26th March 2026

Filing Number

200107/2012

Filing Date

11-10-2012

Registration No

200107/2012

Registration Date

11-10-2012

Court

District Munsif Court, Vandavasi

Judge

2-District Munsif,Vandavasi

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Amendment Petition Section MallikaBarook

Petitioner(s)

Mallika

Adv. Tr.VG.Senthilnathan

Respondent(s)

Barook Advocate - Tr.T.G.Ezhilarasan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif,Vandavasi

05-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

17-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

05-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

28-01-2026

For further Proceedings

21-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

19-06-2025
Copy of Decree
25-07-2025
I.A Order
26-09-2025
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This is a criminal case (Case No. 107/2012) under Section 10 of the 1987 Act heard in a District Court on 26.09.2025. The court examined three documents/exhibits dated 24.07.2012, 25.06.2012, and 31.01.2000, and found that while Exhibits 2 and 3 contained certain statements bearing the accused's signature, Exhibit 2 was admitted as genuine evidence and Exhibit 3 was admitted as certified true copy. The case has been adjourned for further hearing as per the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a criminal case (Case No. 107/2012) under Section 10 of the 1987 Act heard in a District Court on 26.09.2025. The court examined three documents/exhibits dated 24.07.2012, 25.06.2012, and 31.01.2000, and found that while Exhibits 2 and 3 contained certain statements bearing the accused's signature, Exhibit 2 was admitted as genuine evidence and Exhibit 3 was admitted as certified true copy. The case has been adjourned for further hearing as per the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Vandavasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case