Arumugam vs Prabu Advocate - Tr.T.G.Ezhilarasan — 200108/2011
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b)27c. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM160002912011
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
200108/2011
Filing Date
09-08-2011
Registration No
200108/2011
Registration Date
09-08-2011
Court
District Munsif Court, Vandavasi
Judge
2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arumugam
Adv. Tr.S.Isaac Newton, B.Sc., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Prabu Advocate - Tr.T.G.Ezhilarasan
Saranraj
Assistant Engineer
Divisional Engineer
Superintendent of Engineer
Lakshmanan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 29-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil language court order from the District Munsif Court in Vandavasi dated 24.02.2026 concerning Civil Case No. 108/2011. The court conducted a detailed examination of property boundary disputes and land records, analyzing various sections of the Indian Penal Code (sections 32/6, 32/6a, 32/6e, etc.) and earlier court decisions. The court upheld the findings regarding land measurements totaling 88 cents and dismissed objections to the recorded evidence and boundary determinations. No further appeal was granted, and the case concluded with the judge's order being finalized in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil language court order from the District Munsif Court in Vandavasi dated 24.02.2026 concerning Civil Case No. 108/2011. The court conducted a detailed examination of property boundary disputes and land records, analyzing various sections of the Indian Penal Code (sections 32/6, 32/6a, 32/6e, etc.) and earlier court decisions. The court upheld the findings regarding land measurements totaling 88 cents and dismissed objections to the recorded evidence and boundary determinations. No further appeal was granted, and the case concluded with the judge's order being finalized in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts