G.Varathan vs Meganathan Advocate - Exparte — 200076/2008
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 42a. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM160002372008
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
200076/2008
Filing Date
14-03-2008
Registration No
200076/2008
Registration Date
17-03-2008
Court
District Munsif Court, Vandavasi
Judge
2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G.Varathan
Adv. TR.R.M.Mani
Respondent(s)
Meganathan Advocate - Exparte
A.V.Ramakrishna Iyyar (died)
R.Nagarajan
Vasu
Ananthan
Maithili
Vijaya
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 03-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: M/T/VZ./76-2008 Date: 27.08.2024 Court: Chennai High Court (Tamil Nadu) Outcome: The court dismissed the petition filed by the 2nd and 3rd petitioners against the 1st petitioner. The court found that the 1st petitioner's claims regarding unauthorized alterations to the General Power of Attorney and non-receipt of documents were not substantiated, and upheld the validity of the impugned authority letter and the actions taken thereunder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: M/T/VZ./76-2008 Date: 27.08.2024 Court: Chennai High Court (Tamil Nadu) Outcome: The court dismissed the petition filed by the 2nd and 3rd petitioners against the 1st petitioner. The court found that the 1st petitioner's claims regarding unauthorized alterations to the General Power of Attorney and non-receipt of documents were not substantiated, and upheld the validity of the impugned authority letter and the actions taken thereunder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts