Subramaniyan vs Kamala — 200307/2008
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM160002222008
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
200307/2008
Filing Date
10-12-2008
Registration No
200307/2008
Registration Date
10-12-2008
Court
District Munsif Court, Vandavasi
Judge
2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subramaniyan
Adv. Tr. J. Nethaji
Respondent(s)
Kamala
Baskar
Gowri
Santhanam
Anjali Devi
Jamuna
Venkatachalam
Sargunam
The Sub-Registrar, Chetpet
District Registrar, Tiruvannamalai
Prakar Estate and Weldings Pvt. Ltd. Rep by Managing Director B. Vasugi
Vijayan
Rajalakshmi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Amendment
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 30-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 11-12-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 28-11-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed under Order 22 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) by the Petitioners/Plaintiffs against the Respondents/Defendants was allowed by the District Munsif Court, Vandavasi on 25th June 2025. The court found the reasons satisfactory and granted the relief sought, with no costs imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed under Order 22 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) by the Petitioners/Plaintiffs against the Respondents/Defendants was allowed by the District Munsif Court, Vandavasi on 25th June 2025. The court found the reasons satisfactory and granted the relief sought, with no costs imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts