Mythili vs A.V. Ramakrishna Ayyar — 200111/2007
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM160001662007
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
200111/2007
Filing Date
27-04-2007
Registration No
200111/2007
Registration Date
27-04-2007
Court
District Munsif Court, Vandavasi
Judge
2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mythili
Adv. Tr. P. Ramalingam, B.A., LLB.,
Respondent(s)
A.V. Ramakrishna Ayyar
R.Nagarajan
Vasu
Ananthan
Meganathan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Civil Cases No. 111/2007 and 76/2008 before the District Munsif, Vandavasi, the court examined disputes involving monetary transactions and property sales. The court found that the first defendant's general power of attorney was validly executed for property sale purposes, acknowledged a payment of Rs. 1,00,000 received on 04.06.2004, and noted that the remaining balance of Rs. 84,800 was to be remitted. The court further recorded that certain documents were executed on 16.06.2004 and noted the involvement of the first defendant's son in a settlement deed, concluding the hearing without making specific orders on the settlement and power of attorney issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Civil Cases No. 111/2007 and 76/2008 before the District Munsif, Vandavasi, the court examined disputes involving monetary transactions and property sales. The court found that the first defendant's general power of attorney was validly executed for property sale purposes, acknowledged a payment of Rs. 1,00,000 received on 04.06.2004, and noted that the remaining balance of Rs. 84,800 was to be remitted. The court further recorded that certain documents were executed on 16.06.2004 and noted the involvement of the first defendant's son in a settlement deed, concluding the hearing without making specific orders on the settlement and power of attorney issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts