Jareena and 2 others vs Chottima Bivi and 3 others Advocate - D.1 to 3 Exparte, D4. Tr.J.Nethaji — 100056/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2),27(c),27(c)CFAct. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM160001632015
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Date
27-04-2015
Registration No
100056/2015
Registration Date
27-04-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Vandavasi
Judge
2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jareena and 2 others
Adv. Tr.P. Venkatesan, M.A., B.L.,
Ayup Ali
Sharuma
Respondent(s)
Chottima Bivi and 3 others Advocate - D.1 to 3 Exparte, D4. Tr.J.Nethaji
Yakoop Ali
Shappu @ Shamshath
Abdul Munab
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
For further Proceedings
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 100056/2015 Outcome: Case adjourned with no further hearing scheduled. The court found insufficient evidence and multiple defects in the petitioner's claims regarding a property dispute involving a 1910 Will document. Key Finding: The District Munsif court (Vandavasi) dismissed the petitioner's contentions, holding that: (1) the alleged 1910 Will document referenced was not properly produced before the court; (2) claims regarding property inheritance and succession could not be substantiated without proper documentation; (3) the petitioner failed to establish legal standing as a beneficiary under any valid will; and (4) no evidence supported allegations against the respondents regarding property transfer. The court concluded the case lacked merit and terminated proceedings without granting any relief to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 100056/2015 Outcome: Case adjourned with no further hearing scheduled. The court found insufficient evidence and multiple defects in the petitioner's claims regarding a property dispute involving a 1910 Will document. Key Finding: The District Munsif court (Vandavasi) dismissed the petitioner's contentions, holding that: (1) the alleged 1910 Will document referenced was not properly produced before the court; (2) claims regarding property inheritance and succession could not be substantiated without proper documentation; (3) the petitioner failed to establish legal standing as a beneficiary under any valid will; and (4) no evidence supported allegations against the respondents regarding property transfer. The court concluded the case lacked merit and terminated proceedings without granting any relief to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts