Sambantha Moorthy vs Bakthavachalam — 95/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Sec.37(2). Status: Steps. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM160001332019
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
159/2019
Filing Date
30-07-2019
Registration No
95/2021
Registration Date
17-12-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Vandavasi
Judge
2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sambantha Moorthy
Adv. Tmt.D.Shanmugapriya, B.A., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Bakthavachalam
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Steps
Steps
Steps
For further Proceedings
Lok Adalat
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Steps | |
| 26-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 14-03-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 12-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Munsif Court, Vandavasi allowed the petition filed by Sambanthamoorthy under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure to implead parties 2 to 4 (Ezhilarasi, Rajesh, and Aruna) as defendants in Original Suit No. 95/2021. The court granted the petition without cost, as the respondents filed no counter-affidavit and the court found it was in the interest of justice to allow the impleading of necessary parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Munsif Court, Vandavasi allowed the petition filed by Sambanthamoorthy under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure to implead parties 2 to 4 (Ezhilarasi, Rajesh, and Aruna) as defendants in Original Suit No. 95/2021. The court granted the petition without cost, as the respondents filed no counter-affidavit and the court found it was in the interest of justice to allow the impleading of necessary parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts