Nadarajan vs Kannappillai (Died) and 2 others Advocate - D1, D3 died — 200011/2007
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM160000992007
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
23-01-2007
Registration No
200011/2007
Registration Date
23-01-2007
Court
District Munsif Court, Vandavasi
Judge
2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nadarajan
Adv. Tr.P.Ramalingam
Respondent(s)
Kannappillai (Died) and 2 others Advocate - D1, D3 died
Jothi
Narayanasamy Pillai (Died)
Kasthuri
Seenuvasan
Murali Krishnan
Thilagavathi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 18-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 01-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 11-03-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 10-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Allowed with Costs The District Munsif court allowed the petition filed by Kanna Pillai and Jothi (2nd defendants in O.S. No. 11/2007) to set aside the exparte order against them. The court found that the petitioners needed to give evidence in the jointly-tried suit (O.S. No. 132/2003) and that setting aside the exparte order was necessary. However, since the petition was filed late in the proceedings, the petitioners were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1,000 to the respondent by August 20, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Allowed with Costs The District Munsif court allowed the petition filed by Kanna Pillai and Jothi (2nd defendants in O.S. No. 11/2007) to set aside the exparte order against them. The court found that the petitioners needed to give evidence in the jointly-tried suit (O.S. No. 132/2003) and that setting aside the exparte order was necessary. However, since the petition was filed late in the proceedings, the petitioners were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1,000 to the respondent by August 20, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts