K.Duraisamy vs 1. Manikkam (Died) 2. Palani 3. Ganesan 4. Sub-Registrar,Peranamallur. Advocate - Tr. .Rajendiran — 200031/2004
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 42a27c27c. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM160000832004
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
19-02-2004
Registration No
200031/2004
Registration Date
19-02-2004
Court
District Munsif Court, Vandavasi
Judge
2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.Duraisamy
Adv. Tr. T.G.Ezilarasan
Respondent(s)
1. Manikkam (Died) 2. Palani 3. Ganesan 4. Sub-Registrar,Peranamallur. Advocate - Tr. .Rajendiran
Palani
Ganesan
The Sub Register
Poonkothai
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Disposed
Judgement
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 10-03-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 26-02-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 11-02-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court decided in favor of the plaintiff regarding a disputed ancestral property (scheduled house). The court ordered that the 1st defendant's heirs (2nd and 5th defendants) must receive Rs. 14,700 as agreed consideration, execute a deed transferring the property to the plaintiff, and ensure the property is not sold to anyone else, while also dismissing the plaintiff's prayer against the 4th defendant regarding an injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court decided in favor of the plaintiff regarding a disputed ancestral property (scheduled house). The court ordered that the 1st defendant's heirs (2nd and 5th defendants) must receive Rs. 14,700 as agreed consideration, execute a deed transferring the property to the plaintiff, and ensure the property is not sold to anyone else, while also dismissing the plaintiff's prayer against the 4th defendant regarding an injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts