Shobana vs J.Punniyakotti — 8/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27c. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed without cost on 09th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM160000052023
Filing Number
6/2023
Filing Date
10-01-2023
Registration No
8/2023
Registration Date
10-01-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Vandavasi
Judge
2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shobana
Adv. Tr.A.Nawab John, M.A., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
J.Punniyakotti
K.Suresh
Kumar
P. Pichandi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Vandavasi
Disposed
For further Proceedings
Judgement
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 8/2023 Petitioner: Shobana Respondents: J. Punniyakotti, K. Suresh, and Kumar Court Decision The court upheld Shobana's claim to ancestral property (jayam), finding that property gifted in 1964 and transferred through successive generations remained validly part of her inheritance rights. The court rejected the respondents' challenges, holding that the property records and transfer documents were properly documented and that Shobana's acquisition of the property through lawful succession was unimpeachable. The court awarded full relief to Shobana, declaring her rightful ownership of the disputed ancestral property and prohibiting any interference by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 8/2023 Petitioner: Shobana Respondents: J. Punniyakotti, K. Suresh, and Kumar Court Decision The court upheld Shobana's claim to ancestral property (jayam), finding that property gifted in 1964 and transferred through successive generations remained validly part of her inheritance rights. The court rejected the respondents' challenges, holding that the property records and transfer documents were properly documented and that Shobana's acquisition of the property through lawful succession was unimpeachable. The court awarded full relief to Shobana, declaring her rightful ownership of the disputed ancestral property and prohibiting any interference by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts