Sub Inspector Of Police Vandavasi North Police Station vs Karthikeyan — 1564/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a),4(1)(i)TNPACT. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 20th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTM150035262025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-10-2025

Filing Number

3526/2025

Filing Date

22-10-2025

Registration No

1564/2025

Registration Date

22-10-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vandavasi

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate,Vandavasi

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

135

Police Station

North Police Station, Vandavasi

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a),4(1)(i)TNPACT

Petitioner(s)

Sub Inspector Of Police Vandavasi North Police Station

Adv. Sub Inspector of police

Respondent(s)

Karthikeyan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate,Vandavasi

20-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

Judgement

01-04-2026

Questioning

13-03-2026

Questioning

09-03-2026

Questioning

Final Orders / Judgements

20-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 1564/2025 Court Decision: The Magistrate's Court acquitted both accused (Sub Inspector Karthikeyan and another officer) of charges under Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(i) r/w 4(1)(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the accused sold 115 liquor bottles for commercial purposes. The court ruled that possession alone does not establish intent to sell without corroborating evidence such as witness testimony from actual buyers or seizure documentation per legal procedures. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove the three essential elements for conviction: possession of liquor bottles, that bottles contained alcohol, and that possession was for sale rather than personal consumption. Critical procedural lapses—including improper sample collection and lack of proper destruction certificates under Section 32(c) of the Prohibition Act—weakened the case, and the testimonies of government witnesses did not establish the accused's criminal intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1564/2025 Court Decision: The Magistrate's Court acquitted both accused (Sub Inspector Karthikeyan and another officer) of charges under Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(i) r/w 4(1)(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the accused sold 115 liquor bottles for commercial purposes. The court ruled that possession alone does not establish intent to sell without corroborating evidence such as witness testimony from actual buyers or seizure documentation per legal procedures. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove the three essential elements for conviction: possession of liquor bottles, that bottles contained alcohol, and that possession was for sale rather than personal consumption. Critical procedural lapses—including improper sample collection and lack of proper destruction certificates under Section 32(c) of the Prohibition Act—weakened the case, and the testimonies of government witnesses did not establish the accused's criminal intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vandavasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case