SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VADAVANAKKAMBADI PS vs JEEVA — 1542/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),351(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTM150033052025
e-Filing Number
27-09-2025
Filing Number
3305/2025
Filing Date
29-09-2025
Registration No
1542/2025
Registration Date
29-09-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Vandavasi
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate,Vandavasi
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
68
Police Station
Vadavanakkampadi P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VADAVANAKKAMBADI PS (Police Station)
Adv. sub inspector of police vadavanakambadi ps
Respondent(s)
JEEVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate,Vandavasi
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 11-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Vandavasi recorded the deposition of a 54-year-old witness (defence witness) in Case No. C.C.1542/2025 under Chapter XXIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure on 16.03.2026. The witness testified that he currently works at a specific location and stated that when the accused officer was transferred, he could not comply with a court summons, providing testimony in support of the defence based on his personal knowledge. The court recorded statements regarding injuries examination, witness identification, and cross-examination regarding charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Vandavasi recorded the deposition of a 54-year-old witness (defence witness) in Case No. C.C.1542/2025 under Chapter XXIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure on 16.03.2026. The witness testified that he currently works at a specific location and stated that when the accused officer was transferred, he could not comply with a court summons, providing testimony in support of the defence based on his personal knowledge. The court recorded statements regarding injuries examination, witness identification, and cross-examination regarding charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts