The Drugs Inspector vs Sasikumar, Proprietor, Advocate - S. Dhanraj — 363/2023

Case under Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 Section 32,18(c),65(2),65(3)(1),65(4)(3)(i),27(d)DCAct. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTM150003962023

Questioning

Next Hearing

15th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

396/2023

Filing Date

01-07-2023

Registration No

363/2023

Registration Date

01-07-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vandavasi

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate,Vandavasi

Acts & Sections

DRUGS & COSMETICS ACT, 1940 Section 32,18(c),65(2),65(3)(1),65(4)(3)(i),27(d)DCAct

Petitioner(s)

The Drugs Inspector

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sasikumar, Proprietor, Advocate - S. Dhanraj

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate,Vandavasi

22-04-2026

Questioning

15-04-2026

Evidence

06-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

22-04-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary This is a witness deposition document (not a court judgment with an outcome order). A 39-year-old witness testified in Case No. S.T.C.363/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Vandavasi, regarding an investigation into alleged illegal sale of medicines at a pharmacy during the COVID-19 pandemic, in violation of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The witness provided detailed testimony about regulatory violations found during an inspection, including improper storage, missing documentation, and unauthorized sale of restricted medicines, ultimately supporting prosecution charges under Sections 65(2), 65(3)(1), and 65(4)(3)(i) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a witness deposition document (not a court judgment with an outcome order). A 39-year-old witness testified in Case No. S.T.C.363/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Vandavasi, regarding an investigation into alleged illegal sale of medicines at a pharmacy during the COVID-19 pandemic, in violation of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The witness provided detailed testimony about regulatory violations found during an inspection, including improper storage, missing documentation, and unauthorized sale of restricted medicines, ultimately supporting prosecution charges under Sections 65(2), 65(3)(1), and 65(4)(3)(i) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vandavasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case