GANESAN AND ANOTHER vs LAKSHMI AND 2 OTHERS — 66/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s.37(2),Sec26,Or7,Ru1. Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM100002742022

Mediation

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

Filing Number

224/2022

Filing Date

30-08-2022

Registration No

66/2022

Registration Date

20-10-2022

Court

Additional District Court, Arani

Judge

4-Additional District Judge(Fast Track Court),Arni

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s.37(2),Sec26,Or7,Ru1

Petitioner(s)

GANESAN AND ANOTHER

Adv. THIRU.M. SARATHI

BASKARAN

Respondent(s)

LAKSHMI AND 2 OTHERS

BHARATH

RAJIMOHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Additional District Judge(Fast Track Court),Arni

05-03-2026

Mediation

07-02-2026

Mediation

22-01-2026

Issues

12-12-2025

Issues

21-11-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

27-02-2024
Copy of Order/Judgment

Case Summary O.S.No.66/2022 - Ganesan & Baskaran v. Lakshmi & Others *Additional District Court (FTC), Arani, Tiruvannamalai District* *Judgment dated 27 February 2024* The suit for partition and separate possession of 1/4th share in Hindu joint family properties was decreed partly without costs. A preliminary decree was passed partitioning the 12 suit properties into four equal shares, with one share allotted to the plaintiffs. The defendants did not appear to contest the plaintiffs' documentary and oral evidence establishing their status as legal heirs of the deceased Sumathi, entitling them to their inheritance share. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary O.S.No.66/2022 - Ganesan & Baskaran v. Lakshmi & Others *Additional District Court (FTC), Arani, Tiruvannamalai District* *Judgment dated 27 February 2024* The suit for partition and separate possession of 1/4th share in Hindu joint family properties was decreed partly without costs. A preliminary decree was passed partitioning the 12 suit properties into four equal shares, with one share allotted to the plaintiffs. The defendants did not appear to contest the plaintiffs' documentary and oral evidence establishing their status as legal heirs of the deceased Sumathi, entitling them to their inheritance share. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Court, Arani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case