Natarajan vs T.M.Arumugam — 1/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM080001882024
Filing Number
187/2024
Filing Date
12-Dec-2024
Registration No
1/2025
Registration Date
07-Jan-2025
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Cheyyar
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Natarajan
Adv. Tr.M.S.Sankarapandiyan
-
2.Palani
Adv. Tr.M.S.Sankarapandiyan
-
3.Panchasaram
-
4.Devaraj
Adv. Tr.M.S.Sankarapandiyan
-
5.Poonkavana pillai
Adv. Tr.M.S.Sankarapandiyan
Respondent(s)
-
1.T.M.Arumugam
-
2.Santhi
-
3.Elumalai
-
4.Saravanan
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This case involves a petition (Case 01/2025) filed by Natarajan and Palani and Panchasaram against T.M. Arumugam and Santhi and Elumalai. The court heard the petitioner's statement under Section 3 of the CrPC 1969, where the petitioner claimed lack of knowledge about the case details, the persons involved, and property matters in dispute. The court found the petitioner's testimony vague and inconsistent regarding witnesses, property descriptions, and the involvement of 12 individuals in the dispute. The court adjourned the case for further proceedings, directing the parties to submit clarification on the record and property details before the court for verification and proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
09-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
19-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
07-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
29-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
22-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
25-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
01-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
26-Aug-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
11-Aug-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
28-Jul-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
21-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
08-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
07-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
30-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
23-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
20-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
14-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
05-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
08-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
10-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
08-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
07-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
07-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2025
This case involves a petition (Case 01/2025) filed by Natarajan and Palani and Panchasaram against T.M. Arumugam and Santhi and Elumalai. The court heard the petitioner's statement under Section 3 of the CrPC 1969, where the petitioner claimed lack of knowledge about the case details, the persons involved, and property matters in dispute. The court found the petitioner's testimony vague and inconsistent regarding witnesses, property descriptions, and the involvement of 12 individuals in the dispute. The court adjourned the case for further proceedings, directing the parties to submit clarification on the record and property details before the court for verification and proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts