Nirmala Nagarajan vs Janakiraman Advocate - S Anandhan — 108/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM080001692024

Filing Number

168/2024

Filing Date

20-Nov-2024

Registration No

108/2024

Registration Date

20-Dec-2024

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Cheyyar

Judge

3-Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed without cost

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nirmala Nagarajan

    Adv. S Anandhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Janakiraman Advocate - S Anandhan

  2. 2.Ariudainambi

  3. 3.Devaki

  4. 4.Anandhi

  5. 5.Anbazhaki

  6. 6.Arivazhaki

  7. 7.Gowthamraj

  8. 8.Sub Registrar - II

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Principal District Munsif, Cheyyar granted the plaintiff's suit and directed the Sub-Registrar II to remove the erroneous "House site no. 9" entry from the encumbrance certificate in Document 123/2024. The court established that the plaintiff's property and the property attached in execution proceedings (belonging to Munusamy's heirs) are entirely different based on varying extents, boundaries, and survey numbers, with the first defendant admitting this distinction during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  11. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  12. 20-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  13. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  14. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  15. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  16. 03-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  18. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  19. 05-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  20. 08-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  21. 28-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  22. 14-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  23. 06-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  24. 24-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  25. 10-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  26. 08-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  27. 29-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  28. 31-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  29. 02-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  30. 03-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  31. 02-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  32. 26-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  33. 20-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  34. 20-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 20-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 108/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal District Munsif, Cheyyar granted the plaintiff's suit and directed the Sub-Registrar II to remove the erroneous "House site no. 9" entry from the encumbrance certificate in Document 123/2024. The court established that the plaintiff's property and the property attached in execution proceedings (belonging to Munusamy's heirs) are entirely different based on varying extents, boundaries, and survey numbers, with the first defendant admitting this distinction during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case