Krishnan vs Ravi — 96/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM080001612024
Filing Number
160/2024
Filing Date
05-Nov-2024
Registration No
96/2024
Registration Date
13-Nov-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Cheyyar
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
Last updated 09-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Krishnan
Adv. Thiru.S. Karthikeyan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ravi
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
15-Apr-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
01-Apr-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
30-Mar-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
24-Mar-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of I.A OrderView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of I.A OrderView PDF
SUMMARY: The petition filed by Krishnan under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to implead R. Pandian, the District Collector, and the Tahsildar as defendants in the original suit (OS 96/2024) concerning temple administration and management has been allowed. The court found that these proposed defendants are proper parties whose presence is necessary for complete and effective adjudication of the disputes, as their actions directly relate to the subject matter of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
10-Mar-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
26-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
20-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
19-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
17-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
06-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
27-Jan-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
06-Jan-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
10-Dec-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
27-Nov-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
12-Nov-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
28-Oct-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
15-Oct-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
20-Sep-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
09-Sep-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
08-Aug-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
04-Aug-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
17-Jul-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
18-Jun-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
16-Jun-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
14-Jun-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
22-Apr-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
28-Mar-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
08-Mar-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
26-Feb-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
28-Jan-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
21-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
13-Dec-2024
Appearance
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
13-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 96/2024
SUMMARY: The petition filed by Krishnan under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to implead R. Pandian, the District Collector, and the Tahsildar as defendants in the original suit (OS 96/2024) concerning temple administration and management has been allowed. The court found that these proposed defendants are proper parties whose presence is necessary for complete and effective adjudication of the disputes, as their actions directly relate to the subject matter of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts