Krishnan vs Ravi — 96/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM080001612024

Filing Number

160/2024

Filing Date

05-Nov-2024

Registration No

96/2024

Registration Date

13-Nov-2024

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Cheyyar

Judge

3-Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Krishnan

    Adv. Thiru.S. Karthikeyan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ravi

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of I.A OrderView PDF

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of I.A OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The petition filed by Krishnan under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to implead R. Pandian, the District Collector, and the Tahsildar as defendants in the original suit (OS 96/2024) concerning temple administration and management has been allowed. The court found that these proposed defendants are proper parties whose presence is necessary for complete and effective adjudication of the disputes, as their actions directly relate to the subject matter of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  12. 20-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  13. 19-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  14. 17-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  15. 06-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  16. 27-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  17. 06-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  18. 10-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  19. 27-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  20. 12-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  21. 28-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  22. 15-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  23. 20-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  24. 09-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  25. 08-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  26. 04-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  27. 17-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  28. 18-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  29. 16-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  30. 14-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  31. 22-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  32. 28-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  33. 08-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  34. 26-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  35. 28-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  36. 21-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  37. 13-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar

  38. 13-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 05-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 96/2024

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The petition filed by Krishnan under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to implead R. Pandian, the District Collector, and the Tahsildar as defendants in the original suit (OS 96/2024) concerning temple administration and management has been allowed. The court found that these proposed defendants are proper parties whose presence is necessary for complete and effective adjudication of the disputes, as their actions directly relate to the subject matter of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case