Murugammal vs Elumalai — 82/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM080001412023
Filing Number
138/2023
Filing Date
22-Aug-2023
Registration No
82/2023
Registration Date
30-Aug-2023
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Cheyyar
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
Last updated 11-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Murugammal
Adv. Thiru. D. Thangadurai
-
2.Selvarani
-
3.Santhi
-
4.Latchumi
-
5.Rajivgandhi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Elumalai
-
2.Kanniyappan
Case History
-
26-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
05-Mar-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
03-Mar-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
26-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
17-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
12-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
02-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
28-Jan-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
22-Jan-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
06-Jan-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
10-Dec-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
27-Nov-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
25-Nov-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
10-Nov-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
27-Oct-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
10-Oct-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
16-Sep-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
26-Aug-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
12-Aug-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
24-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
15-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
15-Jul-2025
Restored
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
15-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
07-Jul-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
07-Jul-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The petition filed by defendants Elumalai and Kanniyappan under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to set aside an ex-parte decree dated 24.11.2023 has been allowed. The court found that the defendants' non-appearance on 29.09.2023 was due to genuine illness and old age, constituting sufficient cause for their absence. The ex-parte decree is hereby set aside and the original suit (O.S. No. 82/2023) is restored to file, allowing the defendants to present their defense. However, the defendants must pay costs of Rs. 750 to the plaintiffs on or before 15.07.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Nov-2023
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
24-Nov-2023
Disposed
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
23-Nov-2023
Judgement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
20-Nov-2023
Judgement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
16-Nov-2023
Judgement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
15-Nov-2023
Judgement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
07-Nov-2023
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
07-Nov-2023
Judgement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
02-Nov-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
19-Oct-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
13-Oct-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
06-Oct-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
29-Sep-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
30-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 82/2023
Summary: The petition filed by defendants Elumalai and Kanniyappan under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to set aside an ex-parte decree dated 24.11.2023 has been allowed. The court found that the defendants' non-appearance on 29.09.2023 was due to genuine illness and old age, constituting sufficient cause for their absence. The ex-parte decree is hereby set aside and the original suit (O.S. No. 82/2023) is restored to file, allowing the defendants to present their defense. However, the defendants must pay costs of Rs. 750 to the plaintiffs on or before 15.07.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts