Ramachandiran vs Rajarajan — 67/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c),27(c),27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM080001262024
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
125/2024
Filing Date
01-08-2024
Registration No
67/2024
Registration Date
02-08-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Cheyyar
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramachandiran
Adv. Thiru. K.Anandharaj
Respondent(s)
Rajarajan
Mohan
Arumugam
Joint Sub Registrar II
The Tahsildar
The District collector
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Trial |
| 06-02-2026 | Trial |
| 29-01-2026 | Trial |
| 07-01-2026 | Trial |
| 10-12-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The Principal District Munsif Court, Cheyyar dismissed the petitioner Ramachandiran's application seeking temporary/interim injunction restraining the Sub-Registrar from registering documents relating to disputed property. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, demonstrated irreparable injury, or show balance of convenience, as title and possession were heavily disputed by the respondents. The court determined that granting the interim injunction would essentially decide the main suit prematurely and would cause greater hardship to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The Principal District Munsif Court, Cheyyar dismissed the petitioner Ramachandiran's application seeking temporary/interim injunction restraining the Sub-Registrar from registering documents relating to disputed property. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, demonstrated irreparable injury, or show balance of convenience, as title and possession were heavily disputed by the respondents. The court determined that granting the interim injunction would essentially decide the main suit prematurely and would cause greater hardship to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts