Ramachandiran vs Rajarajan — 67/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c),27(c),27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM080001262024
Filing Number
125/2024
Filing Date
01-Aug-2024
Registration No
67/2024
Registration Date
02-Aug-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Cheyyar
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
Last updated 11-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramachandiran
Adv. Thiru. K.Anandharaj
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajarajan
-
2.Mohan
-
3.Arumugam
-
4.Joint Sub Registrar II
-
5.The Tahsildar
-
6.The District collector
Case History
-
13-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
06-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
29-Jan-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
07-Jan-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
10-Dec-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
09-Dec-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
04-Dec-2025
Copy of I.A OrderView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
Copy of I.A OrderView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
Copy of I.A OrderView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
Copy of I.A OrderView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
Copy of I.A OrderView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
Copy of I.A OrderView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
Copy of I.A OrderView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
Copy of I.A OrderView PDF
SUMMARY The Principal District Munsif Court, Cheyyar dismissed the petitioner Ramachandiran's application seeking temporary/interim injunction restraining the Sub-Registrar from registering documents relating to disputed property. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, demonstrated irreparable injury, or show balance of convenience, as title and possession were heavily disputed by the respondents. The court determined that granting the interim injunction would essentially decide the main suit prematurely and would cause greater hardship to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
26-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
21-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
13-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
05-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
17-Oct-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
07-Oct-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
18-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
03-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
19-Aug-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
04-Aug-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
21-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
04-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
11-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
22-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
01-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
27-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
29-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
18-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
27-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
04-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
15-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
14-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
10-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
13-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif,Cheyyar
-
02-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 67/2024
SUMMARY The Principal District Munsif Court, Cheyyar dismissed the petitioner Ramachandiran's application seeking temporary/interim injunction restraining the Sub-Registrar from registering documents relating to disputed property. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, demonstrated irreparable injury, or show balance of convenience, as title and possession were heavily disputed by the respondents. The court determined that granting the interim injunction would essentially decide the main suit prematurely and would cause greater hardship to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts