Sivakumaran and another vs G.Ramalingam and others Advocate - A.S.Karunanithi — 200210/2013
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(b)and27(c). Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTM070002652013
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200210/2013
Filing Date
02-12-2013
Registration No
200210/2013
Registration Date
02-12-2013
Court
District Munsif Court, Arani
Judge
2-District Munsif,Arani
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sivakumaran and another
Adv. K.R.Rajan
Respondent(s)
G.Ramalingam and others Advocate - A.S.Karunanithi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary District Munsif Court, Arni - Order dated March 30, 2026 The court decreed both suits in favor of the plaintiffs (K.S. Sivakumaran and Sudha Sivakumaran), declaring that they are the absolute owners of the agricultural land in dispute. The court held that the 2007 sale deed executed by Indian Bank under SARFAESI Act was legally invalid because Section 31(i) of SARFAESI excludes agricultural lands from enforcement, and the defendants failed to prove lawful conversion of the land to non-agricultural use prior to the auction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary District Munsif Court, Arni - Order dated March 30, 2026 The court decreed both suits in favor of the plaintiffs (K.S. Sivakumaran and Sudha Sivakumaran), declaring that they are the absolute owners of the agricultural land in dispute. The court held that the 2007 sale deed executed by Indian Bank under SARFAESI Act was legally invalid because Section 31(i) of SARFAESI excludes agricultural lands from enforcement, and the defendants failed to prove lawful conversion of the land to non-agricultural use prior to the auction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts