D.Muniyandi vs D.Meera ammal and 5 others — 200169/2017
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 37(2),27(c)ofTNCF. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTM070002562017
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200169/2017
Filing Date
30-11-2017
Registration No
200169/2017
Registration Date
30-11-2017
Court
District Munsif Court, Arani
Judge
2-District Munsif,Arani
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D.Muniyandi
Adv. M.Rajakumar
Respondent(s)
D.Meera ammal and 5 others
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 24-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 17-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
This court order from Madurai District Court (dated June 23, 2024) in case No. 169/2017 under Section 10-1873 concerns a petition filed by an assistant. The court examined the petition on merits and found the allegations lack proper documentary evidence to support the claims. The petition is dismissed as the accused's contentions are established and no substantive proof of the alleged wrongdoing is on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This court order from Madurai District Court (dated June 23, 2024) in case No. 169/2017 under Section 10-1873 concerns a petition filed by an assistant. The court examined the petition on merits and found the allegations lack proper documentary evidence to support the claims. The petition is dismissed as the accused's contentions are established and no substantive proof of the alleged wrongdoing is on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts