V.Satya vs N.P. Syed asker — 138/2019
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM070002482019
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
405/2019
Filing Date
19-12-2019
Registration No
138/2019
Registration Date
19-12-2019
Court
District Munsif Court, Arani
Judge
2-District Munsif,Arani
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V.Satya
Adv. T.Saravanan.,B.A.,B.L., P.Sridevi. B.A.,B.L., T.Ramesh. B.A.,B.L.,
Respondent(s)
N.P. Syed asker
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 30-03-2026 | Amendment | |
| 10-03-2026 | Amendment | |
| 20-02-2026 | Amendment | |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary O.S. 138/2019 - District Munsif Court, Arni This is a civil suit involving a dispute over moveable property (56 cents total). The court examined the testimony of Plaintiff's Witness (P.W.1), a 36-year-old, regarding the transfer and possession of the disputed property. The witness testified about receiving the property on 23/02/2017 and its subsequent handling, though discrepancies emerged regarding documentation and the manner of transfer. The court recorded detailed cross-examination findings regarding the authenticity of possession, the identity of parties involved in the transfer, and the chain of custody of the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary O.S. 138/2019 - District Munsif Court, Arni This is a civil suit involving a dispute over moveable property (56 cents total). The court examined the testimony of Plaintiff's Witness (P.W.1), a 36-year-old, regarding the transfer and possession of the disputed property. The witness testified about receiving the property on 23/02/2017 and its subsequent handling, though discrepancies emerged regarding documentation and the manner of transfer. The court recorded detailed cross-examination findings regarding the authenticity of possession, the identity of parties involved in the transfer, and the chain of custody of the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts