1.S.Narayanan and 5 others vs 1.V.Ramalinga Muthalaiyar and 2 others — 200102/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTM070001502017
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
200102/2017
Filing Date
12-07-2017
Registration No
200102/2017
Registration Date
28-07-2017
Court
District Munsif Court, Arani
Judge
2-District Munsif,Arani
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
1.S.Narayanan and 5 others
Adv. K.Chandrasekaran
Respondent(s)
1.V.Ramalinga Muthalaiyar and 2 others
V.NATARAJA MUTHALIYAR
The Thasildar
KAMALAMMAL
LAKSHMI
DHARANI
SABAPATHY
VIJAYA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. 102/2017 before the District Munsif, Arni, the court recorded the cross-examination of Defendant Witness 1 (D.W.1), an 87-year-old male. The witness testified regarding his occupation as an agricultural laborer and provided statements about property ownership, family details, and various documents presented during examination. The court examined several documentary exhibits (P.S.A.3 through P.S.A.8) and verified reference numbers and dates cited therein. The cross-examination concluded with the witness's testimony being recorded and verified by the court as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. 102/2017 before the District Munsif, Arni, the court recorded the cross-examination of Defendant Witness 1 (D.W.1), an 87-year-old male. The witness testified regarding his occupation as an agricultural laborer and provided statements about property ownership, family details, and various documents presented during examination. The court examined several documentary exhibits (P.S.A.3 through P.S.A.8) and verified reference numbers and dates cited therein. The cross-examination concluded with the witness's testimony being recorded and verified by the court as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts