Munusamy mudaliar vs Arul raja others Advocate - R.Santhanam — 200066/2010
Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTM070001352010
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
200066/2010
Filing Date
11-03-2010
Registration No
200066/2010
Registration Date
11-03-2010
Court
District Munsif Court, Arani
Judge
2-District Munsif,Arani
Petitioner(s)
Munusamy mudaliar
Adv. M.Sivakumaran.
Respondent(s)
Arul raja others Advocate - R.Santhanam
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 20-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 09-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 01-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S.66/2010 - Munusamy Mudaliar v. Arul Raja & Others This is a civil suit heard before the District Munsif Court in Arni under the Indian Contract Act, 1969. The document records cross-examination of Witness P.W.2 (a 42-year-old witness) regarding allegations about document alterations and claims related to property records. The cross-examination concluded without further examination noted. The order is a procedural record of witness testimony rather than a substantive judgment on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S.66/2010 - Munusamy Mudaliar v. Arul Raja & Others This is a civil suit heard before the District Munsif Court in Arni under the Indian Contract Act, 1969. The document records cross-examination of Witness P.W.2 (a 42-year-old witness) regarding allegations about document alterations and claims related to property records. The cross-examination concluded without further examination noted. The order is a procedural record of witness testimony rather than a substantive judgment on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts