K.P.Somasundaram, aged 67, and another vs K.P.Kalyanasundaram, aged 64, and others — 200050/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Or.21R.35(1)and(2)CPc. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNTM070001322015

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Date

05-08-2015

Registration No

200050/2015

Registration Date

05-08-2015

Court

District Munsif Court, Arani

Judge

2-District Munsif,Arani

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Or.21R.35(1)and(2)CPc

Petitioner(s)

K.P.Somasundaram, aged 67, and another

Adv. A.Dhasthageer

Respondent(s)

K.P.Kalyanasundaram, aged 64, and others

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani

29-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

08-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

13-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

25-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

06-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

05-01-2017
Copy of Order/Judgment

Case Summary: E.P.No.50/2015 in O.S.No.66/2004 The execution petition filed by K.P. Somasundaram and K.K. Perumalsamy Mudaliar seeking delivery of immovable property (marked ABCD in the plaint plan) as per a 2014 decree in Original Suit No. 66/2004 was allowed. The District Munsif rejected the respondents' counter-arguments that the decree was ex parte and that a settlement existed, noting the respondents failed to file an interlocutory application to set aside the decree despite a 10-year delay in proceedings. Property delivery was ordered by 04.02.2017, with interest (batta) payable within 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: E.P.No.50/2015 in O.S.No.66/2004 The execution petition filed by K.P. Somasundaram and K.K. Perumalsamy Mudaliar seeking delivery of immovable property (marked ABCD in the plaint plan) as per a 2014 decree in Original Suit No. 66/2004 was allowed. The District Munsif rejected the respondents' counter-arguments that the decree was ex parte and that a settlement existed, noting the respondents failed to file an interlocutory application to set aside the decree despite a 10-year delay in proceedings. Property delivery was ordered by 04.02.2017, with interest (batta) payable within 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Arani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case