Venkatarathinam vs K.Seshachalam Advocate - K.R.Rajan — 200228/2012

Case under Ia/5/2023 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section VenkatarathinamK.Seshachalam. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNTM070001282012

Evidence

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

Filing Number

200228/2012

Filing Date

29-10-2012

Registration No

200228/2012

Registration Date

16-11-2012

Court

District Munsif Court, Arani

Judge

2-District Munsif,Arani

Acts & Sections

Ia/5/2023 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section VenkatarathinamK.Seshachalam

Petitioner(s)

Venkatarathinam

Adv. S.Ramesh

Respondent(s)

K.Seshachalam Advocate - K.R.Rajan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani

10-03-2026

Evidence

05-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

10-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

10-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: In O.S. 228/2012 before the District Munsif, Arni, the court examined witness P.W.2's testimony regarding a property dispute. The witness testified about when he first inspected the property (28.03.2015), the FMB (Field Measurement Book) documents, and the condition of the land. The court recorded findings on the witness's cross-examination regarding inconsistencies in his statements about property measurements, documentation provided to other witnesses, and discrepancies in the FMB records. Witnesses 10 and 11 were also noted as not being examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.S. 228/2012 before the District Munsif, Arni, the court examined witness P.W.2's testimony regarding a property dispute. The witness testified about when he first inspected the property (28.03.2015), the FMB (Field Measurement Book) documents, and the condition of the land. The court recorded findings on the witness's cross-examination regarding inconsistencies in his statements about property measurements, documentation provided to other witnesses, and discrepancies in the FMB records. Witnesses 10 and 11 were also noted as not being examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Arani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case