Meganathan 2 Others vs Venkatesan another Advocate - A.Dhasthageer — 200157/2012
Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTM070001262012
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200157/2012
Filing Date
01-08-2012
Registration No
200157/2012
Registration Date
01-08-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Arani
Judge
2-District Munsif,Arani
Petitioner(s)
Meganathan 2 Others
Adv. M. Sivakumaran
Respondent(s)
Venkatesan another Advocate - A.Dhasthageer
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 08-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 26-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Munsif Court, Arni allowed the petition filed by defendants M.R. Venkatesan and M.R. Ramesh under Order VIII Rule 1A(3) and Section 151 CPC to receive four additional documents (original patta, two sale deeds from 1938, and one from 1952) as evidence in the property dispute suit. The court granted permission for the documents to be marked as exhibits during the defendant's evidence stage, subject to production of originals and proof of relevancy, finding that receiving the documents serves the interests of justice and provides both parties equal opportunity to prove their case on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Munsif Court, Arni allowed the petition filed by defendants M.R. Venkatesan and M.R. Ramesh under Order VIII Rule 1A(3) and Section 151 CPC to receive four additional documents (original patta, two sale deeds from 1938, and one from 1952) as evidence in the property dispute suit. The court granted permission for the documents to be marked as exhibits during the defendant's evidence stage, subject to production of originals and proof of relevancy, finding that receiving the documents serves the interests of justice and provides both parties equal opportunity to prove their case on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts