Tamilselvi vs 1.Jagannathan and 5 others — 200073/2017
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 31. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTM070001062017
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200073/2017
Filing Date
07-06-2017
Registration No
200073/2017
Registration Date
07-06-2017
Court
District Munsif Court, Arani
Judge
2-District Munsif,Arani
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tamilselvi
Adv. V.Venkadesan
Respondent(s)
1.Jagannathan and 5 others
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 30-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 23-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 04-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: 73/2017 | Date: March 7, 2022 | Court: Madurai District Court The petition filed by the applicant regarding disputed property ownership was dismissed. The court found that the applicant's claims lacked merit after examining the documentary evidence and testimonies presented, and accordingly rejected the petition with directions for the applicant to bear the costs of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: 73/2017 | Date: March 7, 2022 | Court: Madurai District Court The petition filed by the applicant regarding disputed property ownership was dismissed. The court found that the applicant's claims lacked merit after examining the documentary evidence and testimonies presented, and accordingly rejected the petition with directions for the applicant to bear the costs of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts