Sivakumaran vs Ramalingam — 50/2019
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(d) 23(c). Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM070000912019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
158/2019
Filing Date
22-04-2019
Registration No
50/2019
Registration Date
22-04-2019
Court
District Munsif Court, Arani
Judge
2-District Munsif,Arani
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sivakumaran
Adv. M/s. Vasu
Sudha Sivakumaran
Respondent(s)
Ramalingam
Rajendiran
Meenatchi Sundaram
The Sub Registrar, Arani
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani
Disposed
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 24-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 23-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 17-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The District Munsif Court, Arni decreed both suits in favor of the plaintiffs. The court held that the SARFAESI Act sale deed dated 05.12.2007 executed by Indian Bank to the first defendant was void and non-binding, as the suit properties were agricultural lands exempt from SARFAESI enforcement under Section 31(i). Consequently, subsequent settlement and sale deeds executed by subsequent purchasers were also declared null and void, and the court granted the plaintiffs declaration of title, permanent injunction against interference with possession, and restraint on alienation of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary The District Munsif Court, Arni decreed both suits in favor of the plaintiffs. The court held that the SARFAESI Act sale deed dated 05.12.2007 executed by Indian Bank to the first defendant was void and non-binding, as the suit properties were agricultural lands exempt from SARFAESI enforcement under Section 31(i). Consequently, subsequent settlement and sale deeds executed by subsequent purchasers were also declared null and void, and the court granted the plaintiffs declaration of title, permanent injunction against interference with possession, and restraint on alienation of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts