Jayakumar vs Murugasundaram Advocate - M.K.Jayaprakasam — 200271/2010

Status: Trial. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

Trial Next hearing 13-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNTM070000352010

Filing Number

200271/2010

Filing Date

25-Nov-2010

Registration No

200271/2010

Registration Date

25-Nov-2010

Court

District Munsif Court, Arani

Judge

2-District Munsif,Arani

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jayakumar

    Adv. V.Venkatesan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Murugasundaram Advocate - M.K.Jayaprakasam

Case History

  1. 13-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif,Arani

  3. 24-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif,Arani

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif,Arani

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif,Arani

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif,Arani

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif,Arani

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif,Arani

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif,Arani

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif,Arani

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif,Arani

  12. 17-Oct-2025

    Restored

    District Munsif,Arani

  13. 17-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif,Arani

  14. 17-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif,Arani

  15. 15-Sep-2016

    Copy of Order/JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The District Munsif Court, Arni partially allowed the suit filed by Jayakumar for declaration of title to the suit property. The court declared the plaintiff as the absolute owner of the property based on his registered sale deed dated 06.10.2008, finding that his vendor validly executed a power of attorney. However, the court denied the plaintiff's claim for permanent injunction against the first defendant, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish possession or any interference by the defendant. The suit against defendants 2-4 (State and revenue officials) was dismissed as no relief was sought against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 15-Sep-2016

    Disposed

  17. 31-Aug-2016

    Orders

  18. 29-Aug-2016

    Arguments

  19. 26-Aug-2016

    Arguments

  20. 06-Aug-2016

    Evidence

  21. 20-Jul-2016

    Evidence

  22. 07-Jun-2016

    Evidence

  23. 21-Apr-2016

    Evidence

  24. 12-Apr-2016

    Issue of Service

  25. 04-Apr-2016

    Evidence

  26. 30-Mar-2016

    For further Proceedings

  27. 23-Mar-2016

    For further Proceedings

  28. 26-Feb-2016

    Arguments

  29. 28-Jan-2016

    Arguments

  30. 19-Jan-2016

    Arguments

  31. 17-Dec-2015

    Arguments

  32. 16-Dec-2015

    —

  33. 10-Dec-2015

    Await Reports

  34. 08-Dec-2015

    Await Reports

  35. 02-Nov-2015

    Await Reports

  36. 07-Oct-2015

    Await Reports

  37. 23-Sep-2015

    Await Reports

  38. 09-Sep-2015

    Await Reports

  39. 19-Aug-2015

    Await Reports

  40. 11-Aug-2015

    Await Reports

  41. 29-Jul-2015

    Await Reports

  42. 10-Jul-2015

    Await Reports

  43. 17-Jun-2015

    Await Reports

  44. 05-Jun-2015

    Arguments

  45. 05-Mar-2015

    Arguments

  46. 19-Jan-2015

    Arguments

  47. 17-Nov-2014

    Arguments

  48. 21-Jun-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 25-Nov-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200271/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif Court, Arni partially allowed the suit filed by Jayakumar for declaration of title to the suit property. The court declared the plaintiff as the absolute owner of the property based on his registered sale deed dated 06.10.2008, finding that his vendor validly executed a power of attorney. However, the court denied the plaintiff's claim for permanent injunction against the first defendant, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish possession or any interference by the defendant. The suit against defendants 2-4 (State and revenue officials) was dismissed as no relief was sought against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case