SUJATHA AND 2 OTHERS vs THE COMMISSIONER, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, ARNI EAST AND THREE OTHERS — 28/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(C). Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM070000162023
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
32/2023
Filing Date
13-02-2023
Registration No
28/2023
Registration Date
06-03-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Arani
Judge
2-District Munsif,Arani
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUJATHA AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. THIRU. M. SIVAKUMARAN
Buvaneswari
Anandi
Respondent(s)
THE COMMISSIONER, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, ARNI EAST AND THREE OTHERS
The Block Development Officer
The President
Prem Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 12-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 19-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 17-12-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 13-11-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner was allowed. The District Munsif Court appointed Advocate Mr. N. Jagadesh as Advocate Commissioner to inspect the disputed properties ('A' and 'B' schedule properties) with a surveyor's assistance, measure them, and file a detailed report with plan by November 13, 2025. The court found that disputed factual questions regarding property boundaries, passages, pipeline damage, and construction proximity necessitated local investigation for proper adjudication. The Commissioner's fee is fixed at Rs. 7,000/-, initially borne by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner was allowed. The District Munsif Court appointed Advocate Mr. N. Jagadesh as Advocate Commissioner to inspect the disputed properties ('A' and 'B' schedule properties) with a surveyor's assistance, measure them, and file a detailed report with plan by November 13, 2025. The court found that disputed factual questions regarding property boundaries, passages, pipeline damage, and construction proximity necessitated local investigation for proper adjudication. The Commissioner's fee is fixed at Rs. 7,000/-, initially borne by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts