PREMRAJ vs RANJITH — 3/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 26. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM070000132025
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
16/2025
Filing Date
23-01-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
30-01-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Arani
Judge
2-District Munsif,Arani
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PREMRAJ
Adv. S. Pradeep
Respondent(s)
RANJITH
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 09-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 30-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 16-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The District Munsif Court dismissed the petitioner's application for interim/temporary injunction (I.A. No. 01/2025) under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC seeking to restrain the respondent from trespassing on the disputed property. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of possession, as the respondent's claim of continuous possession since 2002 appeared more credible despite the petitioner's registered settlement deed from 2023. The court held that actual possession is in serious dispute and can only be determined after full trial with both parties presenting evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The District Munsif Court dismissed the petitioner's application for interim/temporary injunction (I.A. No. 01/2025) under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC seeking to restrain the respondent from trespassing on the disputed property. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of possession, as the respondent's claim of continuous possession since 2002 appeared more credible despite the petitioner's registered settlement deed from 2023. The court held that actual possession is in serious dispute and can only be determined after full trial with both parties presenting evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts