PREMRAJ vs RANJITH — 3/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 26. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM070000132025

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

16/2025

Filing Date

23-01-2025

Registration No

3/2025

Registration Date

30-01-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Arani

Judge

2-District Munsif,Arani

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 26
IA/1/2025 Classification : Injunction Petition Section PREMRAJRANJITH
IA/2/2025 Classification : Reciever Petition Section PREMRAJRANJITH

Petitioner(s)

PREMRAJ

Adv. S. Pradeep

Respondent(s)

RANJITH

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani

16-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

09-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

30-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

10-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

16-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

31-10-2025
Copy of Order/Judgment

Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The District Munsif Court dismissed the petitioner's application for interim/temporary injunction (I.A. No. 01/2025) under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC seeking to restrain the respondent from trespassing on the disputed property. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of possession, as the respondent's claim of continuous possession since 2002 appeared more credible despite the petitioner's registered settlement deed from 2023. The court held that actual possession is in serious dispute and can only be determined after full trial with both parties presenting evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The District Munsif Court dismissed the petitioner's application for interim/temporary injunction (I.A. No. 01/2025) under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC seeking to restrain the respondent from trespassing on the disputed property. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of possession, as the respondent's claim of continuous possession since 2002 appeared more credible despite the petitioner's registered settlement deed from 2023. The court held that actual possession is in serious dispute and can only be determined after full trial with both parties presenting evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Arani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case