Sundhari vs J.Arunprasath. S/0 Jayapal — 13/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or21R22,37,38. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNTM070000042022

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

9/2022

Filing Date

12-01-2022

Registration No

13/2022

Registration Date

24-03-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Arani

Judge

2-District Munsif,Arani

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or21R22,37,38

Petitioner(s)

Sundhari

Adv. C.M.Vinayagam. B.A.,B.L., (Arni)

Respondent(s)

J.Arunprasath. S/0 Jayapal

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif,Arani

24-04-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

15-04-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

08-04-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

13-03-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

18-02-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

Interim Orders

09-03-2023
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary: EP.No 13/2022 in OS 18/2019 The court heard the matter on March 9, 2023. Petitioner Sundhari testified that she obtained a judgment in her favor and that the respondent J. Arunprasath possesses movable property (items/articles) that belong to her, which she identified. The court examined the evidence and found the petitioner's claims credible. The court ordered attachment/seizure of the respondent's movable property in execution of the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EP.No 13/2022 in OS 18/2019 The court heard the matter on March 9, 2023. Petitioner Sundhari testified that she obtained a judgment in her favor and that the respondent J. Arunprasath possesses movable property (items/articles) that belong to her, which she identified. The court examined the evidence and found the petitioner's claims credible. The court ordered attachment/seizure of the respondent's movable property in execution of the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Arani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case