A.Dhanasekaran vs Kumaresan (a) Kumaravelu and another — 100099/2017

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or21R22,37,38. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNTM060006232017

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

Next Hearing

10th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

100099/2017

Filing Date

29-11-2017

Registration No

100099/2017

Registration Date

29-11-2017

Court

District Munsif Court, Polur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Or21R22,37,38

Petitioner(s)

A.Dhanasekaran

Adv. K.Rajendiran

Respondent(s)

Kumaresan (a) Kumaravelu and another

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

29-04-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

10-03-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

06-01-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

19-11-2025

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

25-10-2025

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

Interim Orders

06-12-2018
Copy of Deposition

Summary In this Tamil Nadu District Court order dated 06.12.2018, the court examined a petition (Case No. 99/2017) filed under Section 1873 of the 1873 Act. The court found that the petitioner's submissions and documentary evidence were examined, and the court determined that the petition merits consideration on its merits. The case was adjourned for further hearing with directions for proper examination of the matters raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this Tamil Nadu District Court order dated 06.12.2018, the court examined a petition (Case No. 99/2017) filed under Section 1873 of the 1873 Act. The court found that the petitioner's submissions and documentary evidence were examined, and the court determined that the petition merits consideration on its merits. The case was adjourned for further hearing with directions for proper examination of the matters raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Polur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case