Thangavel and another vs KRISHNAN AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - VCD (D — 100308/2013
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1ANDSEC151. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTM060004002013
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100308/2013
Filing Date
22-10-2013
Registration No
100308/2013
Registration Date
22-10-2013
Court
District Munsif Court, Polur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thangavel and another
Adv. M.SAMPATHRAJAN
Respondent(s)
KRISHNAN AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - VCD (D
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA Pending
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In OS No. 308/2013 before the District Munsif Court, Polur, the plaintiff Senthilkumar (47 years old) filed his first affidavit on 26.03.2026, affirming that all statements and documents submitted are true. The court admitted 12 documentary exhibits including land deed from 1962, property receipts, settlement deeds, previous judgment from case 371/2012, and official notices from the Polur Tahsildar, marking them as evidence (Exhibit 1 through 12). The first affidavit and examination of the plaintiff witness concluded with the District Munsif recording the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In OS No. 308/2013 before the District Munsif Court, Polur, the plaintiff Senthilkumar (47 years old) filed his first affidavit on 26.03.2026, affirming that all statements and documents submitted are true. The court admitted 12 documentary exhibits including land deed from 1962, property receipts, settlement deeds, previous judgment from case 371/2012, and official notices from the Polur Tahsildar, marking them as evidence (Exhibit 1 through 12). The first affidavit and examination of the plaintiff witness concluded with the District Munsif recording the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts