Subramaniyan vs Sagadevan Advocate - K.Dharman — 100156/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTM060002322018
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100156/2018
Filing Date
27-01-2012
Registration No
100156/2018
Registration Date
27-01-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Polur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subramaniyan
Adv. V.C.Dhinakaran
Respondent(s)
Sagadevan Advocate - K.Dharman
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a cross-examination record (OS No. 156/2018) in a civil suit before the District Munsif Court, Polur, dated February 18, 2026, involving a dispute over property inheritance based on a will. The witness (plaintiff, aged 63) testified regarding the distribution of ancestral property among five sons, claiming he received only 1/3 share of a well and 6 percent of a surveyed plot (14/5) under the will, while disputing the allocation to other heirs. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding property boundaries, water rights, and the disputed distribution of assets under the contested will. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a cross-examination record (OS No. 156/2018) in a civil suit before the District Munsif Court, Polur, dated February 18, 2026, involving a dispute over property inheritance based on a will. The witness (plaintiff, aged 63) testified regarding the distribution of ancestral property among five sons, claiming he received only 1/3 share of a well and 6 percent of a surveyed plot (14/5) under the will, while disputing the allocation to other heirs. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding property boundaries, water rights, and the disputed distribution of assets under the contested will. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts