Sasikala rep. by her power of Attorney agent Mahalakshmi vs Enayadulla and 5 Others — 100046/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(a),27(c),27(c)TNCFact. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 15th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTM060001372018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100046/2018
Filing Date
24-02-2011
Registration No
100046/2018
Registration Date
24-02-2011
Court
District Munsif Court, Polur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sasikala rep. by her power of Attorney agent Mahalakshmi
Adv. P. Arunkumar
Respondent(s)
Enayadulla and 5 Others
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 26-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Munsif Court in Tiruvannamalai decreed a suit in favor of the plaintiff Sasikala, declaring her title to 0.20 cents of agricultural property (Schedule A) inherited from her deceased brother Parthasarathy under a 1975 conditional gift deed. The court ordered defendants 1-3 to surrender possession of properties B-D (totaling 0.36 cents) sold illegally by the plaintiff's father in violation of alienation restrictions, and granted permanent and mandatory injunctions against further transfers and improper land registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The District Munsif Court in Tiruvannamalai decreed a suit in favor of the plaintiff Sasikala, declaring her title to 0.20 cents of agricultural property (Schedule A) inherited from her deceased brother Parthasarathy under a 1975 conditional gift deed. The court ordered defendants 1-3 to surrender possession of properties B-D (totaling 0.36 cents) sold illegally by the plaintiff's father in violation of alienation restrictions, and granted permanent and mandatory injunctions against further transfers and improper land registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts