Sambath vs Mayandi — 93/2025
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section U/Sec.27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM060001182025
Filing Number
162/2025
Filing Date
21-Jul-2025
Registration No
93/2025
Registration Date
23-Jul-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Polur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Last updated 09-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sambath
Adv. Thiru.K.S.Sankar MS 1121/2006
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mayandi
-
2.Balaji
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
13-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary OS No. 93/2025 - District Munsif Court, Polur (Tamil Nadu) The plaintiff's first examination-in-chief was recorded on 13.11.2025, where the plaintiff (65-year-old agriculturist) affirmed his statement and submitted supporting documents including property tax certificates (dated 18.04.2018 and 11.04.2025) and a settlement deed (dated 11.02.2021). The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony and marked the documents as evidence; the case is pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
13-Oct-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
04-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
25-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
23-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2025
Case Summary OS No. 93/2025 - District Munsif Court, Polur (Tamil Nadu) The plaintiff's first examination-in-chief was recorded on 13.11.2025, where the plaintiff (65-year-old agriculturist) affirmed his statement and submitted supporting documents including property tax certificates (dated 18.04.2018 and 11.04.2025) and a settlement deed (dated 11.02.2021). The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony and marked the documents as evidence; the case is pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts