Indirani and another vs Pachiyammal(died),Renu and 3 Others Advocate - D1 to 5 T. Chembian — 100060/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2),27(c)TNCFact. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTM060000752018
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
100060/2018
Filing Date
18-04-2011
Registration No
100060/2018
Registration Date
18-04-2011
Court
District Munsif Court, Polur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Indirani and another
Adv. G. Aristatile
Respondent(s)
Pachiyammal(died),Renu and 3 Others Advocate - D1 to 5 T. Chembian
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary OS No. 60/2018 - District Munsif Court, Polur, Tamil Nadu This is a cross-examination record (dated 05.03.2026) of the plaintiff Indrani (age 75) in an Original Suit concerning a Registered Gift Deed (Document No. 2745/1953). The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony regarding disputed property matters, inheritance claims, and allegations that defendants 4 and 5 fraudulently obtained a will document on 19.11.2010. The court noted deficiencies in the plaintiff's pleadings regarding non-impleadment of certain heirs and incomplete reference to relevant survey documents, and directed that the case be dismissed for non-prosecution with the defendants' permission unless these defects are rectified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary OS No. 60/2018 - District Munsif Court, Polur, Tamil Nadu This is a cross-examination record (dated 05.03.2026) of the plaintiff Indrani (age 75) in an Original Suit concerning a Registered Gift Deed (Document No. 2745/1953). The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony regarding disputed property matters, inheritance claims, and allegations that defendants 4 and 5 fraudulently obtained a will document on 19.11.2010. The court noted deficiencies in the plaintiff's pleadings regarding non-impleadment of certain heirs and incomplete reference to relevant survey documents, and directed that the case be dismissed for non-prosecution with the defendants' permission unless these defects are rectified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts