G.Balakrishnan S/o Gajendiran vs M.Sangeetha D/o S.Mani — 178/2023
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(1a). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
HMOP - Hindu Marriage Original Peitition
CNR: TNTM040011372023
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1054/2023
Filing Date
03-11-2023
Registration No
178/2023
Registration Date
03-11-2023
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G.Balakrishnan S/o Gajendiran
Adv. Tr.G.Ezhilmaran
Respondent(s)
M.Sangeetha D/o S.Mani
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Mediation
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 27-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 17-02-2026 | Mediation | |
| 02-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: I.A.No.2/2025 in I.A.No.1/2024 in HMOP.No.178/2023 | Additional Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu, Tiruvannamalai District | Dated: 02.02.2026 Outcome: The court partially allowed the petition. The applicant's documents were accepted and the case was remitted to the lower court for further proceedings. However, the petition was partially dismissed regarding certain documents marked as "highly confidential," which were not admitted due to lack of proper authentication under Indian Evidence Act Section 65(b). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: I.A.No.2/2025 in I.A.No.1/2024 in HMOP.No.178/2023 | Additional Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu, Tiruvannamalai District | Dated: 02.02.2026 Outcome: The court partially allowed the petition. The applicant's documents were accepted and the case was remitted to the lower court for further proceedings. However, the petition was partially dismissed regarding certain documents marked as "highly confidential," which were not admitted due to lack of proper authentication under Indian Evidence Act Section 65(b). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts